Sunday, July 10, 2016

Trying figuring WHY - like the need of a god...

It is but known that the universe (we are the universe too - part and whole) and happenings are deterministic and the 'WHY' like 'God' is the probabilistic intellectual and not an innocence endeavour (i say intellectual as  it is different from innocence because of logic - Innocence is Intellectual  sans balanced use of Logic) to define any and everything, for sanity (not having sanity is not insanity - they are two separate phenomenon, as it is between 0 and 1, there are infinite numbers). But does the enigmatic query 'why' and 'god' has a 'BECAUSE' (the 'why', portraying a dilemma that defies many a standard deducing, which mostly with resultants you will find is in permanence with Nature but may be in abeyance with Culture).  May be . I suppose there may spew in the other equally perplexing 'IF' to try justifying the 'why' and 'god', which is not so. Every incident on the fabric of Time Space is not 'why' or 'god' but 'FOR' with no 'if'. There is an acute method in all randomness.
If there is no God we need to invent one was what a great thinker propounded to condemn an atheist for imbibing functionality of administrative rules in civics and a scientist mused God does not play dice as a metaphor for preciseness in the fabric texture of the universe.
Why do we need a 'why' and 'god' (in both forms : noun and verb) for everything, an external entity ? Often it is our own uncertainty for the need of to justify self or others opinion/perceptions ? Us each being a god (which we often say) to be same with the God post attaining Moksha, though through individual varied means and ways, always seeks god within than without.
We do not need an external 'god' or 'why' for every belief of the self.

No comments:

Post a Comment